Home & Garden

  • Mar
  • 29

A Plea for Lawn Sanity

Posted by at 4:03 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)


Many Americans seem to have a love affair, bordering on obsession, with their lawns. In the endless pursuit of attaining the perfect “Green, Green Grass of Home,” they can sometimes do a great deal of harm to the environment and unintentionally impact us all.

Just how much lawn are we talking about? Based on satellite imaging analysis, American lawns cover more than 40,000 square miles, or an area larger than the state of Kentucky. And all that effort for green grass takes a lot of green in the form of money. A 2002 Harris Survey put the figure at nearly $29 billion, or approximately $1,200 per household.

So let’s take a closer look at each of the four environmental “horsemen of the lawn apocalypse”: land, air, water, and animals.

Land pollution results from the estimated 67 million pounds of synthetic pesticides added to lawns each year. The pesticides include both herbicides and insecticides. In my neighborhood, “lawn care” companies are present nearly every day, spraying or spreading their magic, but toxic, formulas. Some companies post small signs warning children and companion animals to stay off the lawn that has just been treated, and because of them, walking our dogs becomes more like a maze to avoid the treated lawns.

Air pollution is caused in part by gas-powered lawnmowers. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that the 54 million Americans—who, on average, mow their lawns once a week—use 800 million gallons of gasoline a year and produce tons of pollutants. Even newer, more efficient gas-powered mowers still emit 11 times the pollutants of a new car. In refueling mowers, 17 million gallons of fuel are spilled each year.

Water pollution—both ground water and surface water—may also result from the chemicals and pesticides. Then there’s the issue of our limited fresh water, which is used to water lawns. More than 50 percent of residential water use is for landscaping, and most of that is for lawns. On average, about 1,000 gallons of water is used each year for every 100 square feet of lawn. The irony is that the more water that is used—and especially when combined with incessant lawn feeding—the more mowing that has to be done, creating a vicious cycle of environmental hardship.

All this pollution takes a toll on animals. Those lush green lawns are little more than a sterile monoculture—a lifeless, barren, toxic turf. The entire animal food chain is affected, starting with the smallest microorganisms. The insecticides eliminate what little diversity could exist in the herbicidal lawn-only environment. Insects, birds, and mammals all suffer the consequences. Forget the killing fields—these are killing lawns. After some types of treatments in our neighborhood, the evidence is overwhelming: The sidewalk in front of a treated property is strewn with dead earthworms, accidental victims of another lawnocide.

Just like as they think that they must have their meat, milk, and eggs, most Americans simply think that they must have their lush green lawns. And just like with vegan alternatives to that meat, milk, and eggs, there are “green” alternatives to the modern American lawn. Some practical options are offered in my upcoming post “Habitat for Nonhumans.

 

Posted to Home & Garden | Posted to Tags: , , , ,

More:

Bookmark and Share
7 Comments

Subscribe to this post's comment RSS.

    Glen Venezio says...

    March 29th, 2012, 4:34 pm

    So Glad to see this article here………………..I think about the harm of lawns frequently, glad to have this post to share with others now!

    Steve says...

    March 30th, 2012, 3:59 pm

    Great article. I think of this everytime I see fertilizer pellets on the sidewalks too. What also is tragic….how much gets washed away into sewers and back into our rivers & drinking water supplies. We only get one environment and we continue to poison the one we have.

    thomas moore says...

    March 30th, 2012, 4:21 pm

    Please think about the animals. Thank you.

    Kathleen says...

    March 30th, 2012, 5:10 pm

    I love PETA! You always speak for me. This is an issue that I have thinking about a lot! I wish that people would just have meadows instead of lawns or whatever is natural for their area. Stop with the chemicals people! Please.

    monte greene says...

    March 30th, 2012, 5:39 pm

    many years ago people grew food to eat and sell…and flowers to sell. the very wealthy did not need to do this. they had lawns of grass…to prove they did not need to grow their own food. it also was to put distance between themselves and others.

    Susie says...

    April 1st, 2012, 11:51 pm

    Even though I believe all the points this article makes on lawns, I also believe that lawns play an important part of the environment. It prevents dust and erosion. In fact, it’s even mandatory in some housing communities. Plus, I think more people are willing to let their pets in after running around in a lawn rather then tracking in mud if there was no lawn. And if you don’t have a lawn, but take your dog out to the park, you’ll know how much delight dogs find in frolicking and eating grass (cats too). I’m no expert, but I also believe that lawns are an important source of food for wild birds. I always see a bunch of them lingering around on lawns, probably looking for worms and seeds. I can’t imagine worms living in a lot of hard, dry dirt. Lawns are probably a source of food for them too. I think the responsible thing to do to minimize the resources used to maintain lawns is to find out the type of grass that’s most suitable for the area (something low maintenance).

    bossdoza says...

    May 25th, 2013, 2:38 am

    Great article. I think of this everytime I see fertilizer pellets on the sidewalks too.

Post a Comment

Please keep comments polite, constructive, and on topic. All fields in bold are required.

About Home & Garden

Create a wonderful, cruelty-free home and garden.

Recent Comments

Disclaimer

The information and views provided here are intended for informational and preliminary educational purposes only. From time to time, content may be posted on the site regarding various financial planning and human and animal health issues. Such content is never intended to be and should never be taken as a substitute for the advice of readers' own financial planners, veterinarians, or other licensed professionals. You should not use any information contained on this site to diagnose yourself or your companion animals' health or fitness. Readers in need of applicable professional advice are strongly encouraged to seek it. Except where third-party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, reproduction or redistribution of any of the content for personal, noncommercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.