Health

  • Aug
  • 2

Cure for Cancer Found

Posted by at 1:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (5)


©2011 Jupiterimages Corporation

Many cancers can be cured today—if you are a mouse. Unfortunately, humans are still waiting for cancer cures that will work for them. Decades of animal-based laboratory tests have given us some treatments for mice who are genetically and otherwise manipulated to grow tumors. But if we are seeking medical advances for humans, are animal-based experiments really the most effective way to spend our limited resources?

One woman said it to me this way: “If my child was dying, and an animal experiment might find the cure that saves her life, then I wouldn’t hesitate to sacrifice those animals.” Most of us would make enormous sacrifices to save our children, and that’s completely understandable. But to think only in terms of “my child vs. a mouse in a laboratory” misses the essential question we should be asking: Does testing on animals actually yield useful results? I’d like to share a personal story that changed my beliefs about animal testing.

You may remember the drug thalidomide. It was widely prescribed in many countries in the early 1960s for several purposes, one of which was to alleviate morning sickness in pregnant women. The drug caused severe birth defects, and thousands of children were born with shortened limbs and flipper-like hands. Thalidomide was animal-tested before it was used in people, and no adverse effects were reported. Even after the human tragedy started to unfold, subsequent animal testing of thalidomide found similar birth defects in only a few species of animal, and only at very high doses. Simply put, animal tests of thalidomide were not predictive of the effects in humans.

I narrowly escaped being one of the thalidomide babies myself. My mother was traveling in the U.K. during the first months that she was pregnant with me. She had severe morning sickness, so she visited a doctor who prescribed a medication. She took the pills for several weeks, and only when she returned home to the U.S. did she hear about thalidomide on the news. Mom recently told me about her reaction: “My heart just sank when I heard the news story. I had never asked for the name of the medication I took, and I was certain that it was thalidomide. I still had the bottle and was relieved to discover it was a different drug. I never could have forgiven myself if I had done this to you.”

After I found out how lucky I am to be whole and healthy, I started to wonder just how useful animal testing really is. Historically, experiments on animals have been given credit for much more than what they actually helped us learn. And in modern medical science, with its focus on cellular and molecular function, the differences between species far outweigh the similarities. In fact, many drugs have measurably different effects in men and women—how much greater are the differences between humans and other animal species? Not only does testing on animals give misleading results about the risks of drugs in people, but it can also delay discovery of useful human therapies. Penicillin is harmful to guinea pigs, rats, and hamsters. (It was a human trial that opened the door to the discovery of antibiotic drugs.) The painkiller Vioxx was withdrawn from the market after it was found to increase risk of heart attacks and strokes and was found to be responsible for many deaths. Vioxx was tested in several species of animals, and the results suggested that the drug would have heart-protective properties. All new medications and therapies must eventually be tested in human clinical trials, and results from animal testing can give a false sense of security about potential risks to human patients. The FDA admits that an astounding 92 percent of all drugs that test safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials. And half of the 8 percent of drugs that appear successful in human tests have to be withdrawn after they are marketed because of adverse reactions.

The good news is that modern medical science offers many alternative research methods that more accurately predict human results. In vitro testing on human cell cultures, computer modeling, epidemiological analysis, and clinical studies can all be used to develop and test new therapies. 95 percent of medical schools have shut down their animal laboratories and rely instead on cadavers, simulators, and observation to train medical students on what they really need to know: how the human body works.

Visit PETA.org to find out how you can help bring animal experimentation to an end. And check out this site to see whether your favorite charity has stopped spending your money on ineffective and archaic animal tests.

Posted to Health | Posted to Tags: , , ,

More:

Bookmark and Share
5 Comments

Subscribe to this post's comment RSS.

    Robin says...

    August 2nd, 2011, 6:15 pm

    The best way to keep your child or any child from dying or getting sick is to feed them a healthy diet. Too many people use the excuses, “Oh, my child won’t eat such and such healthy foods” and “Oh, these foods I buy, sugarmilkyogurt and chicken nuggets and snackum cereal and cheese slices have vitamins, and so they’re as good as fruits, vegs, legumes that I don’t want to make. A parent who truly puts health first would and should research on his/her own what foods are healthy, what foods are associated with developing disease, and then ignore peer pressure and marketing/ads and make those foods. Starting when the child’s a baby so that good habits are established.

    Sophie says...

    August 6th, 2011, 4:11 am

    Since they can produce human tissue and conduct experiments on that it would save more lives than conducting experiments on animals…

    Dave Bernazani says...

    August 6th, 2011, 3:07 pm

    Great comment, Robin; I totally agree! Children should NOT be deciding their menu; that is up to adults, if they have a little backbone.

    Tina says...

    August 15th, 2011, 10:24 pm

    I think sometimes parents don’t want to change their kids’ unhealthy diets to healthy ones because a) it’s more convenient,b) laziness & c) they don’t want to change their own diets!!!

    Jorja says...

    August 19th, 2011, 12:13 pm

    That’s a really cool way of putting it!

Post a Comment

Please keep comments polite, constructive, and on topic. All fields in bold are required.

About Health

Improve your health, save animals, and protect the planet.

Recent Comments

Disclaimer

The information and views provided here are intended for informational and preliminary educational purposes only. From time to time, content may be posted on the site regarding various financial planning and human and animal health issues. Such content is never intended to be and should never be taken as a substitute for the advice of readers' own financial planners, veterinarians, or other licensed professionals. You should not use any information contained on this site to diagnose yourself or your companion animals' health or fitness. Readers in need of applicable professional advice are strongly encouraged to seek it. Except where third-party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, reproduction or redistribution of any of the content for personal, noncommercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.