Weekly Top 10

About PETA Prime Are you ready to make a big difference for yourself, animals, and the Earth through simple day-to-day choices? PETA Prime has all the information you need to live a healthy, humane, and rewarding life.

PETA Business Friends


  • Feb
  • 24

No Good, Bad, or Ugly Bird?

Posted by at 5:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (10)

No Good, Bad, or Ugly Bird? by Scott VanValkenburgDo you consider any species of bird to be “bad”? If you have a bird feeder in your yard and a cooper’s hawk swoops in and takes another bird for dinner, admit it–don’t you just hate the cooper’s?

It is not surprising that PETA, which was formed to promote respect for all animals, frequently has to challenge groups or government agencies that want to kill certain birds because of perceived problems–for instance, this residential community’s plans to kill acorn woodpeckers.

We also have our work cut out for us convincing individuals that all birds are deserving of equal respect. There is a long history of activists’ making historic changes to save some birds and ignoring or even promoting the suffering and deaths of others.

The passionate 19th-century women who organized a decades-long educational and political battle to end the killing of egrets and other birds for women’s hats saw no need to organize for birds of prey. As Scott Weidensaul notes in Of a Feather, “good bird/bad bird judgments were ubiquitous in the first half of the twentieth century, from backyard birders to the most prominent scientist….”

Egrets and bluebirds were seen as innocent “good birds,” but birds of prey and birds such as the blue jay,  who eat other birds’ eggs, were “bad.” The Audubon Society condemned the millinery trade, but its duck-hunting founders ensured that the organization vigorously opposed “bag limits” (as in “body bag”) or the prohibition of the use of live bird decoys. The Audubon Society reformed somewhat in the 1930s after public outrage at revelations that it made money by selling fur from muskrats killed on its “sanctuaries” and otherwise failed to protect wildlife.

Rosalie Edge was an early-20th-century suffragette and birder whose activism changed societal attitudes and policies toward birds. She helped lead the fight to end the Audubon’s support for killing birds for so-called “sport,” and unlike so many of her time (and, unfortunately, ours), she saw birds for who they are. She was appalled to learn of annual massacres of hawks and eagles along their flyways (superhighways in the skies that birds use during migration; for raptors, these are frequently along mountain ridges). She used her own funds to purchase land on a Pennsylvania mountain in 1932, where one can now stand and watch raptors fly by at eye level (sometimes hundreds, even thousands, in a day). Rosalie also organized to ensure that public funds were directed toward buying national park lands comprised of key wildlife habitats (not just pretty sites that didn’t interfere with logging and mining) where hunting would be prohibited.

The recognition of birds as fascinating beings who have developed varied survival mechanisms over thousands of years has advanced since those early struggles. But attitudes at the individual and societal level still reflect a bias toward “good” and “bad” birds. I catch myself being annoyed at European starlings (a European species that quickly spread through human-altered habitat in North America after a fool in New York released them in 1890 because he wanted to have present any birds mentioned by Shakespeare–I’m not making this up) who empty my peanut feeder, which I keep stocked for nuthatches and woodpeckers.  And, unlike PETA, many bird conservation organizations remain silent when state and federal agencies kill cormorants (“bad”) to protect great blue herons (“good”) or when they poison starlings or shoot laughing gulls. And I haven’t even mentioned serving chicken, turkey, or duck at a birding meeting!

Isn’t it long past time to recognize that birds (and other animals) are individuals who deserve respect, despite the differences they have with us?

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • kathy says:

    I can’t say that i love all birds equally, especially birds of prey. However, I agree that we are in no position to judge birds or any animals, especially given our species’ well known monstrous behaviours toward other species and our own. We have no right to slaughter or harm any birds whether we love them or not. Just as we have no right to harm fellow humans, even if we disaprove of their behviour.

  • debbie says:

    i have witnessed the neighborhood hawk waiting at my many birdfeeders and tho i dont encourage him to eat the birds i have that frequent there i can’t get mad when he is doing what he is supposed to be doing. i get nervous when my cats are out, and i try to shoo him off. there are wetlands he can go find dinner at-not my backyard!but we must be respectful of all animals-they were here first.

  • Christine Guerriero says:

    Yes, right now I’m mad at a Hawk that swooped down and took my Cactus Wren, who was busy making his nest. Dang Hawk ate the bird right outside my window.

  • Lesley says:

    Thank you for writing this. I am a bird lover and hate it when people label birds as “good” and “bad.” There aren’t any bad birds. They are doing what they do best. Do we label are cats bad when they eat a mouse. No, so why label a bird bad? Makes no sense. They are beautiful creatures who deserve our respect.

  • James says:

    The only ones I don’t trust are the ones in Alfred Hitchcock movies, and that was probably due to human interference. 🙂

  • Jeanie says:

    I am a proud supporter of PETA. I am constantly learning, and I appreciate PETA’s work and dedication. I am appalled that people actually call pigeons and seagulls ‘rats with wings.’ I once saw a seagull with a broken wing. The life guards could not find any rescue group that respects sea birds. They ended up taking the bird to their veterinarian. We all felt so helpless. Rosalie Edge is just what the birds need. Thank you.

  • Rachel A says:

    There are no bad wild animals. They do what they do to survive… they don’t have a choice. I’m just grateful that I do.

    I love taking bird seed down to the park and watching the flurry of wings as they all try to reach it first. :3

  • Alberta Bob says:

    My two favorite critters are magpies and coyotes, both pretty much hated here in Alberta. Fortunately (or not, depending on your perspective) neither are endangered in spite of generations of persecution. LOL! That’s why I love ’em!

  • Rev.Steve Hobbie says:

    First, I have to say PETA is doing a great job for animal rights. Nature is nature, there are no bad animals, they do what they do to survive. One group of animals can never be left out, if you truly believe in helping our animal friends.

  • Dianne says:

    Trust in Mother Nature and not the man-made solutions that interfere with nature just taking its course. 🙂

About Home & Garden

Create a wonderful, cruelty-free home and garden.

Recent Comments


The information and views provided here are intended for informational and preliminary educational purposes only. From time to time, content may be posted on the site regarding various financial planning and human and animal health issues. Such content is never intended to be and should never be taken as a substitute for the advice of readers' own financial planners, veterinarians, or other licensed professionals. You should not use any information contained on this site to diagnose yourself or your companion animals' health or fitness. Readers in need of applicable professional advice are strongly encouraged to seek it. Except where third-party ownership or copyright is indicated or credited regarding materials contained in this blog, reproduction or redistribution of any of the content for personal, noncommercial use is enthusiastically encouraged.